Podcast Sixteen: A Tuesday Afternoon Conversation, Part III of III

by Jonathan McKeen on January 18, 2011

The third part of a round-table discussion between some of the members of Tuesday Afternoon: James Iman, Adam Keeney, Theo Warner, Andy Burke, Jonathan McKeen, Lisa Fite, and Nick Bohl.

In this segment, we approach several topics, including the question of how a thing can have truth and meaning even if it is not factually accurate.

PDF

http://twitter.com/nathanieltweet Nathaniel Wallace

I really enjoyed this series of podcasts, although I would probably prefer to have them all available at once. It was a little strange to come into the same conversation weeks apart.

Previous post: Do Arguments Benefit from Agreement?

Next post: The Purpose of Government

Pages
Random Quote
“My soul grazes like a lamb on the beauty of indrawn tides.”
-- Pat Conroy
Newsletter

Email:
What is Tuesday Afternoon?

Tuesday Afternoon is exactly the best sort of time to sit down with a friend over a long, late lunch and talk about the eternal questions of life. Maybe you split a panini. And maybe it drags into the evening. And what could be better? Nothing. Because, discussion is good -- that's all we know and, at Tuesday Afternoon, that's all we set out to do.
Alexander Vilenkin Apologetics argument argumentation atheism atheism vs. theism beauty bible Big Bang Cosmology book review Brian Greene christian Christianity cognitive science Cosmic Origins Cosmology Debate Discovery Institute discussion epistemology epistemonday ethics Fallacy General Relativity god humanism intelligent design Islam Jen Hancock Kalam Cosmological Argument liberalism Morality Multiverse Nietzsche philosophy Quantum Mechanics religion Rhetoric Richard Dawkins Sam Harris science Stephen Hawking theism truth William Lane Craig
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.

Podcast Sixteen: A Tuesday Afternoon Conversation, Part III of III

Pages

Random Quote

Newsletter

What is Tuesday Afternoon?